Learning Goals & Products

Learning Goals

1

Students will be able to investigate firsthand stakeholder evidence to synthesize an evidence-based definition of a school or neighborhood need.

2

Students will be able to define variables, units, domains, and ranges for linear, quadratic, and exponential models that represent quantities in a local issue.

3

Students will be able to graph linear, quadratic, and exponential functions by hand and with technology to identify and interpret key features in context.

4

Students will be able to compare and validate multiple function models using data fit, calculations, graph features, real-world benchmarks, and practical constraints.

5

Students will be able to ideate and prototype multiple solution paths that translate user needs and function-based predictions into a feasible response.

6

Students will be able to test, refine, and justify a selected solution by documenting how peer, teacher, and NY Edge feedback changes the mathematical model, prototype, and public pitch.

Products

individual

User Research and Function-Modeling Design Portfolio

Each student compiles firsthand user-research notes, an evidence-based need statement, hand-drawn and technology-generated function graphs, model comparisons, calculations, an individual concept prototype, and a feedback revision log. Templates for interviews, affinity mapping, decision matrices, and testing protocols support a complete record of individual mathematical mastery and design reasoning.

team

NY Edge Community Solution Prototype and Public Demonstration

Each team uses members’ research and concept prototypes to create a shared problem statement, a higher-fidelity solution prototype, and a concise stakeholder demonstration explaining how multiple function graphs and user feedback support the final choice. After a rehearsal scored by the teacher and reviewed by peers and NY Edge, the team documents and completes one final revision.

Student choices
Evidence-Based Poster Model — A large-format visual prototype combining the proposed solution, specifications, hand-drawn and digital graphs, user evidence, and a concise public pitch.
Interactive Digital Mock-Up — A slide-based, interface-based, or animated prototype showing how the solution would work, supported by labeled function graphs, user evidence, and testing results.
Physical Scale Model — A safe physical model with labeled dimensions or operating features, accompanied by graph evidence, user findings, practical constraints, and testing results.
Rubric
Competency Progression Rubric Competency-first rubric
Category
Learning Goal
Emerging
Developing
Proficient
Applying
Problem Solving
Strategic planning
  • I can recognize when a strategy I’m considering didn’t work in a similar situation in the past.


Project-specific:
  • I can recognize when a strategy I used for a similar graphing or problem-solving task did not work well, and I can name what part of my plan needs to change
  • I can point to an example from my work or team process to show what I learned from that experience.
  • I can identify and describe the connections and similarities between past and current events to find trends and cycles.


Project-specific:
  • I can identify and describe connections between past and current data patterns, graphs, or project decisions, and I can explain similarities that may help me plan a better solution
  • I can use observations from previous function graphs to notice trends or cycles that affect my choice.
  • I analyze and describe how past trends and cycles are or are not related to my strategies and thinking.


Project-specific:
  • I can analyze how past trends, cycles, and graph features are or are not connected to the strategy I am using now, and I can explain why some choices fit the problem better than others
  • I can use evidence from hand-drawn and technology-generated graphs to support how my thinking is changing.
  • I produce a proactive strategic plan for future success by adjusting my strategies and thinking to account for past trends and cycles.


Project-specific:
  • I can create a proactive strategic plan for a future solution by using past trends, cycles, and graph evidence to adjust my thinking and improve my prototype
  • I can explain how my plan for modeling the problem, choosing a function, and revising my product is designed to increase success for the school or community issue.
Problem Solving
Creating solutions
  • I can describe a strategy to create a solution to a given problem.


Project-specific:
  • I can describe a basic strategy for creating a solution to a school or neighborhood problem by using one graph or model to show how it might work
  • I can name a key feature of the function and explain how it helps my idea fit the problem.
  • I can describe a number of potential options to create a solution to a given problem.


Project-specific:
  • I can describe multiple possible solutions for a problem by comparing different function graphs, showing key features by hand or with technology, and explaining how each option could address the need
  • I can use compare, predict, and justify language to tell why one option may work better than another.
  • I assess options and plan actions to create solutions by looking at evidence, the outcomes of past attempts to solve analogous problems, and the reasoned potential for impact.


Project-specific:
  • I can assess several solution options and plan next steps by using graph evidence, results from earlier attempts, and what I learned from similar problems to decide which model has the strongest potential impact
  • I can explain how the key features of each function support my choice and revise my plan based on what the evidence suggests.
  • I assess options and plan actions to create solutions by evaluating evidence that indicates the potential for impact, previous approaches and varied perspectives, and potential consequences, both intended and unintended.


Project-specific:
  • I can evaluate multiple solution options by weighing graph evidence, previous approaches, and different perspectives, including feedback from peers, my teacher, and community partners, to plan a solution with the best chance of helping
  • I can explain possible intended and unintended consequences of my choice, show key features of the functions by hand and with technology, and justify final revisions using clear evidence.